A sampling of some of the analysis I've made that has come to pass is or happening now...
Welcome. The content below is free to the public. It might be worth what you are paying for it. Having studied economics and being in finance for over two decades, I have learned that only one thing is certain - that almost nothing is certain. As we endeavor to come up with our best analysis of the world around us, the opportunities and risks, we have to try to overcome a myriad of issues including our own ignorance, biases and emotions. What follows are my attempts to overcome those obstacles. Welcome to my view - publishing Monday and Friday afternoons.
Today's market action suggests a correlated sell-off is in the marking for the stock and other markets. Only a few assets sectors are doing particularly well, among them 20 Year U.S. Treasuries (TLT) which represent a flight to safety trade. The dollar also firmed representing a "risk off" attitude within markets.
While ease of monetary policy is cited by most of those who project the stock market higher, the reality is that easy money has about run its course. We have already talked about reduced effectiveness of central bank policy.
The markets are absolutely starting to recognize the "slow growth forever" that I have been talking about for over a year. What we know is that there are many economies already in unhealthy places. That is what is driving risk in the markets. When asset prices finally adjust for the reality of global GDP growth around 2% for the next couple decades (or longer) and not the 3.8% we knew from post WWII to 2007, we will be in a healthy market place.
Overnight that Bank of Japan refrained from adding any additional stimulus to their monetary system. It was a mild surprise, although many of us thought they'd wait until some sort of market turbulence to add more money to the money fire.
The Federal Reserve sounded, well, like the Federal Reserve yesterday. In a written statement nothing really changed from before. It was so boring, it's barely a headline today. There was an important message though that continues to be overlooked. The Fed is very concerned about a coming slowdown triggered by international factors.
Today, GDP clocked in at the slowest pace in two years with business investment the lowest since -buhm, buhm, buhm - 2008. The low business investment plays into my theme of "slow growth forever."
The markets reached an 8 month high today and breadth is wide. Normally that signals a bull trend. And to be honest, we could see one for a few more months. But that doesn't negate everything else we've been talking about recently.
Chasing markets higher is a trap that the big market players set for the little guys. Take a look at volume, it is very low. What that means is little guys are chasing higher and big guys are letting them do it by standing aside.
This is a just a quick mid-week interjection. As you know, I recently issued a crash alert. There are literally dozens of reasons I did that. However, here are three more charts that should hit home and make the point that being a very, very patient buyer right now is the play.
The lead chart is the Shiller CAPE ratio. What is that? It is the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio. Basically, it adjusts for normalized earnings over a ten-year period. It does this to represent the cycles that earnings go through from peak to trough to peak again.
The normal CAPE is around 15 or 16, but it can go a few points higher or lower with no real consequence. Right now, earnings are just coming off of peak that was the fourth highest in history. Certainly, with enough central bank money or government stimulus, the ratio could climb to challenge all-time highs. However, given global debt and general mood, the odds of central banks and governments printing and borrowing without a crisis to rally around seems remote.
The more plausible scenario is that the earnings cycle plays out, meaning that earnings, which are already heading down, fall more. So, if earnings do indeed fall, then we would expect prices of stocks to follow suit. I think this is especially true for a few reasons I mention below.
Janet Yellen spoke today and took the opposite view of several of her peers on the Federal Reserve Open Market committee and struck a very dovish tone by stating a need to "proceed cautiously" on interest rate hikes. While this was not unexpected, the tone of her remarks signals that an April rate hike is almost impossible unless there is some unexpected huge uptick in employment or inflation. She pointed out unfavorable market conditions, international concerns and uncertain inflation expectations.
Interestingly, she also said that the Fed had little room to reverse course. This is another signal to me that unless markets and the economy normalize in the direction desired - which is almost impossible due to demographics and accumulated debt - we are simply waiting for the next deflationary event so that the Fed can take "extraordinary" actions during a crisis event. As I have discussed in the forum and am discussing in an upcoming MarketWatch article, we are on the verge of inflation one way or the other. The central banks are going to create inflation, with or without growth - we know mostly without - so they can devalue debt. That devaluation will in turn diminish the standard of living of hundreds of millions of people.
There is a vocal group that likes to talk about the Fed in very negative terms. I have withheld any permanent sort of judgement because I believe there is good and bad in any institution. For example, during the 2008-09 financial crisis it is clear that the Fed did the right thing lowering interest rates to zero and embarking on the first round of quantitative easing. Without that action and the bailouts, the banks would not have survived. Sure, other banks would have taken their place in time, however, the social cost to that multi-year transition would have been monumental and likely violent.
The "good" financial crisis response actions by the Fed of course followed a period where their oversight of the banking industry was woefully deficient and monetary policy the prior eight years was questionable at best. Since the financial crisis ended, which I think can reasonably be put at 2011-12 when real estate bottomed, the Fed has probably been deficient in normalizing monetary policy on the misguided assumption that more easy money is better for stimulating growth. I firmly believe that is not true for two reasons. First, as I have discussed in three articles the past year, "slow growth forever" is due to global aging demographics and an overwhelming debt load, those things cannot be cured with easy money. Second, continued extra easy money clearly leads to the idea that something is wrong, which lowers consumer and business confidence and results in a drag on further economic development.
Wednesday while listening to listened to Janet Yellen give her post-Fed meeting press conference I came away with the distinct impression that the Fed is scared. They are afraid of both the fragile nature of the minor economic growth occurring in the United States and they are now on notice that inflation is starting to rear its head. If that's so, this scenario is a upon us much faster than I thought it would be.
A period where the economy grows slowly or not at all, but still has inflation is called "stagflation" - as coined in late 1960's England. While I believe we are in a "slow growth forever" economic world, I didn't believe inflation would be a problem until after the next major deflationary event and another massive round of devaluations. However, with the world is already so awash in devalued cash and now facing rising energy and food costs, it is possible that we are much closer than I expected. "Stagflation" for those who weren't around in the 1970s is bad news.
Fundamental Trends Investment Letter is NOT a Registered Investment Advisor and does NOT provide personalized advice.
This is a research and information website.
Investors must make their own financial planning and investment decisions based upon your own individual circumstances, goals and risk tolerance.
Please see the Terms of Services for further information.